Latent conditions

Read time: 1 minute

Latent conditions are physical conditions on, underlying or adjacent to the site that could not be identified by reasonable observations or investigations of the site or the site information provided in the tender documentation at the time that the tender for the works was being prepared. Some contracts specifically state what a latent condition is. 

If, as a result of the discovery of latent conditions on the site, the contractor suffers a loss, expense or delay, the contractor is entitled to make a claim.  The claim may include reimbursment for the cost to overcome the latent condition and an adjustment of time (including time costs where applicable) for the period that progress of the works was delayed, or that the construction period was extended, while the latent condition was overcome. 

Where not specifically included in the Conditions of Tender, latent conditions may include:

  • unexpected subsoil conditions affecting the bearing capacity of the site
  • rock at a depth not anticipated (higher or lower)
  • rock harder or softer than anticipated
  • isolated rock 'floaters'
  • services or service locations not in accordance with the site information
  • the capacity of existing services less than advised
  • conditions within an existing building being renovated or altered found to be different to what could reasonably be expected.

Refer to ABIC contracts Section F.

In ABIC contracts, latent conditions do not include:

  • valuable items
  • dangerous or contaminated material.

Different contractual procedures apply if they are discovered. Some contracts may include time bars for the communication of discovery of latent conditions. 

Determination of latent conditions

Architects may be required to assess claims made related to latent conditions while administering the construction contract. To process such a claim, it is important to first ensure whether the contract defines a latent condition and what the definition and contractual mechanisms are. Architects should also determine whether contractors have been asked (at the time of tender) to ensure they are aware of the site and its conditions – and to then make adequate allowances to achieve the contracted outcome. This may impact a principal’s willingness to agree with a latent conditions claim.

Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Related Notes

Extensions of time
Project
3 October 2017
Variation to services
Project
30 November 2011

Recently Viewed

Professional indemnity insurance cover and asbestos
Practice
13 November 2019
Managing time in practice
Practice
30 January 2024
Guide letter 39: Documenting a project from another practice
Resources
8 April 2020
Public liability
Practice
21 July 2020
Professional indemnity insurance for architects
Practice
19 April 2017