Duty to disclose liability

Read time: 1 minute

The Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (the Act) replaced the common law of disclosure, misrepresentations and incorrect statements with a statutory code.

Duty to disclose liability when completing insurance applications

Part IV of the Act provides that an insured is required to disclose all matters relevant to the insurer's decision to accept the risk (s 21). This duty to disclose relevant risks is balanced by exceptions, such as not having to disclose matters that are common knowledge. If there is an obvious failure to disclose, or an obviously incomplete answer, then the insurer is deemed to have waived its right to full disclosure by the insured in relation to the particular matter.

Section 26 of the Act reduces the circumstances within which an incorrect disclosure will be held to be a misrepresentation by the insured. Where a person who would not have reasonably known the correct answer, innocently and incorrectly makes a statement, it will not be misrepresentation.

However, section 28 provides that, where it can be established that a misrepresentation was made fraudulently, or the failure to disclose was fraudulent, the insurer may avoid the contract. If the failure to disclose was an omission, but not fraudulent, the insurer cannot avoid the contract, but the liability of the insurer will be reduced by the amount that would place the insurer in the position they would have been in, if not for the failure to disclose or the misrepresentation.

Development of the law

The courts have held that in relation to joint insurance, as in insurance of a business entity, a reference to the 'insured' is a reference to each of the insured, and the duty contained within section 21 of the Act to disclose relevant matters extends to each owner. Therefore if one owner fails to disclose, either fraudulently or not, the insurer may avoid liability.

In relation to what is determined to be a relevant matter, and therefore requires disclosure, the High Court has held that it has to be a matter relevant to the risk, and that the risk related to the insured risk, rather than some broad definition which encompassed commercial risk, such as whether an insured would consider renewing its contract or not.

Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Recently Viewed

Indigenous cultural authorship and intellectual property
Practice
6 November 2024
Building contract deposits
Project
24 October 2024
2024 Client Architect Agreement (CAA2024)
Project
10 October 2024
Client note: Project supply chain and labour impacts
Resources
2 May 2024
Performance Solutions
Project
23 August 2023