Positive development – designing for net positive impacts

This note was reviewed as up to date and leading edge for time of publication by Author in September 2018 with update not applicable.

This paper challenges the prevalent 'green building' design approach that treats nature as a resource rather than a living ecosystem(s), and aims only to minimise the net negative impacts on the environment. It argues that buildings and cities could increase the ecological base as well as improve the economic and social health of surrounding regions. Genuine sustainability would require the eco-retrofitting of existing development to provide the infrastructure and space to improve ecosystem health and increase natural capital. The good news is that this can be done without sacrificing space for human functions, amenity and life quality. However, it would require a very different kind of environmental management, planning and design.

note summary
  1. Introduction
  2. What is the ecological base?
  3. How could design for eco-services increase the ecological base?
  4. How can we increase ecological carrying capacity?
  5. Are there net positive technologies that go beyond remediation?
  6. How is positive development different?
  7. Best practice green buildings
  8. Offsets
  9. Achieving a sustainability standard
  10. Development and ecological improvement
  11. Ecological space
  12. Incentives to positive development
  13. Trading schemes for ecological space
  14. Conclusion
Download the full note PDF 699KB
Download
Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Related Notes

Design for environmental services
Environment
30 November 2009
Design for eco-services – Part B building services
Environment
30 November 2009

Recently Viewed

Timber and wood
Environment
26 November 2018
Building thermostats – a pilot study
Environment
30 November 2008
Building thermostats – issues
Environment
30 November 2008
Airtightness and thermal bridging in buildings
Environment
6 October 2021
Rating systems
Environment
17 December 2018