Ecological waste: rethinking the nature of waste

This note was reviewed and approved for currency by the Author in September 2018.

The design and construction fields have a central role to play in moving toward a 'zero waste' economy. Total resource consumption, both upstream and downstream from development, could be greatly reduced through ecological design. This will however require a paradigm shift to a more whole systems understanding of waste – as distinguished from what we could term ‘marginal analysis’.

This paper introduces the idea of ‘ecological waste’, which accounts for the loss of ecosystems in assessing development. Ecological waste analysis would consider the time and cost of replacing a living forest ecosystem and not just the biomass or ‘resource’. This is intended to move the goal post toward the aim of eliminating ‘designed waste’, or the duplication, disposability, planned obsolescence and wasteful end purposes to which a large portion of resources are sometimes directed through design. For the purposes of this paper, sustainability is understood in its strongest sense: as expanding future options. It is recommended that note Positive development is read as a preface to this paper.

note summary
  1. Introduction
  2. Doesn't waste depend more on behavior than system design?
  3. Aren't there zero waste programs established to address these issues?
  4. Does this mean that recycling approaches are a waste of time?
  5. Why aren't existing construction waste management practices adequate?
  6. How do system design approaches close loops and prevent disposal?
  7. Does the construction industry use principles of industrial ecology?
  8. What is the difference between eco-efficient and eco-logical?
  9. What is meant by the first step, awareness of 'designed waste'?
  10. What does the second step 'ecological waste analysis' entail?
  11. Don't assessment tools consider time, cost and value already?
  12. Wouldn't reducing ecological waste hurt economic progress?
  13. So how would we assess innovations and prioritise investments?
Download the full note PDF 314KB
Download
Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Recently Viewed

As-built documentation
Project
24 January 2024
Business continuity and disaster planning
Practice
24 January 2024
Slip resistance design considerations
Project
14 December 2023
Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Environment
17 December 2018
Indoor environment quality
Environment
17 December 2018