Beyond codified comfort

Environment
Published: 30 September 2012
Edited: 23 September 2018
by Geoff Clark
ISSN: 2207-466X

This note was reviewed and approved for currency in September 2018.

Increasingly, the designed solution to building performance is being replaced by the engineered solution. The reasons for this are a) the architectural profession’s valuing of the aesthetic over the functional, and b) legislation that mandates occupant comfort as defined by a narrow set of numbers.

A conceptual design from the DS9 design studio
A conceptual design from the DS9 design studio, University of Tasmania

If architecture is to remain viable as a profession we, as architects, must abandon the notion of architecture as a fashion industry. We must also insist upon our right to design buildings that respond to the needs of their occupants, and re-establish the notions of occupant choice and relative comfort.

This note takes a critical look at the current notion of architecture as taste making, then proposes a way forward by re-establishing the notion of architecture as shelter building.

Note Summary
  1. Aesthetics and architecture
  2. Shelter
  3. Relative comfort
  4. Codified comfort
  5. Art and science
  6. A synthesised solution
  7. Geometry and disposition
  8. Sameness vs difference
  9. Conclusion
pdf
699644bytes