Standards - risk management

The risk to architects of specifying standards needs to be managed. Proprietary specification systems such as NATSPEC regularly review all standards to ensure that they are appropriate for inclusion in the master specification. However, it is still necessary for the architect to ensure these are appropriate for the particular project.

To help protect architects from liability for certifying work that is not in accordance with the standards, a clause may be inserted in the contract documents, stating that the contractor bears full responsibility for compliance with the standards specified and called up by the National Construction Code (NCC), and must certify on completion that it has complied with the standards. In some states the requirement for a contractor's certificate is covered by state building acts.

Other possible measures include:

  • the insertion of a clause in the Client and Architect Agreement that in certifying payment, the architect does not warrant nor represent compliance with all possible standards; and
  • insertion of a clause in an architect and subconsultant agreement that the subconsultant is required to check compliance with all standards relevant to their discipline.

Consideration should be given to including checkpoints in the architect's quality-management system procedures for:

  • initial allocation of prime responsibility for the observance of standards; and
  • verification that each of the various parties has provided the required certification of compliance.

Architects cannot avoid responsibilities placed on them by the mandatory inclusion in their documentation of the standards referenced by the NCC; however, beyond such inclusions they can be selective in their use of other standards by calling up only those standards that are particularly relevant to the project.

Architects are sometimes asked to certify that a design complies with the requirements of the NCC. Refer related note: Requests for issuing certificates

Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Related Notes

Requests for issuing certificates
Practice
27 March 2019

Recently Viewed

As-built documentation
Project
24 January 2024
Business continuity and disaster planning
Practice
24 January 2024
Slip resistance design considerations
Project
14 December 2023
Predicted vs actual performance of green buildings
Environment
28 February 2011
Rating systems
Environment
17 December 2018