Design workshops (charrette)

Read time: 2 minutes

A design workshop, or more accurately a design charrette, draws together the architect and the principal members of the design team, the client organisation and other relevant groups with the objective of developing — through a structured workshop — a clear set of design objectives and design-assessment criteria for a project. The charrette may produce a preliminary design for the project. Design charrettes are a particularly useful strategy where the client brief fails to clearly define their design objectives for a project or where the client organisation is diverse and there are obvious competing interests.

Page contents:

Background

The word charrette in this context refers to a collaborative session (or sessions), usually over two or three days, in which the architect, the client(s) and other relevant groups draft a solution to a design problem. While the structure of a charrette varies, depending on the design problem and the individuals in the group, charrettes often take place in multiple sessions in which the group divides into subgroups. Each subgroup considers particular design issues and then presents its work to the full group as material for future dialogue. Such charrettes serve as a way of quickly generating potential design solutions while integrating the aptitudes and interests of a diverse group of people.

Charrettes take place in many disciplines, including architecture, landscape architecture, urban design, industrial design, interior design and graphic design. In urban planning, the charrette has become a technique for consulting with all stakeholders. This type of charrette (sometimes called an enquiry by design) typically involves intense and possibly multi-day meetings, involving municipal officials, developers and residents. A successful charrette promotes joint ownership of solutions and attempts to defuse confrontational attitudes between residents and developers.

In much the same way that a planning charrette engages the community in the planning design and decision-making process and helps establish assessment criteria for planning proposals, a design charrette can engage the main interest groups in a project, identify and resolve competing interests and provide the design team with clear design objectives for the project.

Back to top

Preparation and inputs

While each project will have a differing approach, the following guiding workflow can assist with the successful completion of design workshops:

Stakeholder identification: to ensure the relevant individuals and teams are able to contribute in an appropriate manner
Organisation: to bring together the right teams with valuable preparatory information and inputs which ensures the workshop can be undertaken with the greatest impact.
Contextual understanding: This can be achieved through research, interviews, an analysis of the organisation, observation, tours, benchmarking and study tours.
Vision and objectives: What is the project vision and how does it affect the organisation.
Technical and operational detail: understand the functional requirements of the project through interviews, questionnaires and focus groups.

Design workshops are best facilitated by individuals with experience in guiding the process and the ability to be inclusive and strategic.

Back to top

Value management

Another form of collaborative workshop used to explore design options is value management where the design is tested against the project budget, construction options and project quality objectives with the aim of achieving the best value for money.

Back to top

Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Related Notes

Co-design
Project
27 July 2022
A case study of Seacombe West through LENSES
Environment
30 November 2016

Recently Viewed

Phase change materials – overview
Environment
31 August 2006
Risk management and insurances
Practice
2 March 2017
Project management and project managers
Project
7 December 2011
Professional indemnity insurance cover and asbestos
Practice
13 November 2019
Managing time in practice
Practice
30 January 2024