Residential building sustainability rating tools in Australia

Jacob & Jade’s House Renovation, ACT, by Cooee Architecture. Traditional land owners: The Ngunnawal people. Image: Ben King.Read time: 25 minutes

The residential building sector is a significant contributor to carbon footprint and climate change. This is primarily due to operational energy consumption derived from fossil fuels, and the impact of embodied carbon in materials that are used in construction and maintenance during a building’s life cycle. In the context of transitioning to a low or zero-carbon housing future, building rating tools will play a critical role in improving the environmental performance of new and existing housing.

This note examines key residential rating tools relevant to the Australian context, including some international tools. It aims to provide design practitioners with an understanding of these tools, including considerations to identify where best to apply them in the design process. This note updates information from earlier articles (Iyer-Raniga et al. 2007; Iyer-Raniga et al. 2014).

A case study written by Sarah Lebner, Cooee Architecture, is included in Appendix B of the note to highlight how project optimisation was applied to a house renovation.

Tools examined include: AccuRate Home, BASIX, BERS Pro, BESS, eTool, FirstRate5, Green Star, HERO, NABERS, BREEAM, LEED, Living Building Challenge and Passivhaus.

Related courses - Available via Online CPD
note summary
  1. Introduction
  2. Rating tools: an overview
  3. Australian rating tools
  4. Thermal rating tools
  5. ESD rating tools
  6. International tools
  7. Discussion
  8. Conclusion
Download the full note PDF 4MB
Download
Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Related Notes

Sustainability framework for practice
Environment
11 June 2020
Non-residential building environmental rating tools
Environment
31 March 2016
Passivhaus: low energy buildings in Australasia
Environment
31 May 2017

Recently Viewed

Client note: Selecting an architect
Resources
29 August 2012
As-built documentation
Project
24 January 2024
Business continuity and disaster planning
Practice
24 January 2024
Specialist consultant scope and responsibility
Project
14 June 2023
Slip resistance design considerations
Project
14 December 2023