Mind the gap: predicted vs actual performance of green buildings

Melbourne’s Council House 2 (CH2), a 6-star Green Star rated buildingThis note was reviewed in September 2018 and retained for legacy.

This paper reviews the major North American and Australian sustainability rating tools to determine how they measure building energy performance. It then reviews the major building energy simulation software packages. The paper then details some of the literature surrounding predicted vs. actual energy performance in green buildings, and concludes with an argument for a more performance-orientated ratings regime.

note summary
  1. Introduction
  2. Rating tools
  3. Building Energy Simulation Software
  4. How Green Certified Buildings are Performing
  5. Conclusions & Recommendations
Download the full note PDF 872KB
Download
Disclaimer

This content is provided by the Australian Institute of Architects for reference purposes and as general guidance. It does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. It is not legal, financial, insurance, or other advice and you should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or has become inaccurate over time. Using this website and content is subject to the Acumen User Licence.

Was this note helpful?

We are always looking to improve our content and your opinion is important to us. If you have any feedback or suggestions on how this article could be more relevant and useful, please outline below.

Recently Viewed

As-built documentation
Project
24 January 2024
Business continuity and disaster planning
Practice
24 January 2024
Slip resistance design considerations
Project
14 December 2023
Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Environment
17 December 2018
Slip resistance compliance and testing
Project
14 December 2023